Bhopal. The Indian judiciary is working as per the intention of our Constitution and the Supreme Court of India is not like America, where cases remain pending for decades, the number of cases resolved by us in a day is more than that in many western countries. It is not given even in a year, this statement was made by Chief Justice of Supreme Court D.Y. on the allegation of alleged delay in justice system and justice of India. Chandrachud expressed, and also said that the Supreme Court is the people’s court and it should discharge its role with full devotion, honesty and in accordance with the law. He expressed his opinion on the allegations against the judiciary of bias and acting contrary to the judicial code. He also propounded the important role of the judiciary in democracy.
Justice Chandrachud gave clear instructions to the judiciary that it should not appear in front of the country in the role of opposition party, because the judiciary itself has been reliable among the three organs of the present democracy, executive, legislature and judiciary and the people of the country have only And only trust and loyalty is left towards this part of democracy.
A true and honest review of this claim of Honorable Chief Justice Chandrachud will be held at the public level, but in the meantime the allegation is also true that crores of cases are pending for many years in various courts of the country, the Supreme Court is also included in these courts, here It is noteworthy that the Supreme Court had rightly said that the disposal of cases should be done quickly and in a fixed time frame, but had also termed it as impossible, because it had clearly accused the government of not having enough judges, courts and courts to settle crores of pending cases. There is no staff, which the government is not able to fulfill, if there are enough courts, judges and staff then the pending cases can be resolved soon. The Central Government is completely silent on this answer of the Judiciary. Now it is beyond understanding why the government is not interested in this matter?
Here it is worth considering that instead of blaming the government completely, the Supreme Court itself should make efforts in this direction at its own level and since the Supreme Court is the guiding point for the courts of the country from the High Courts to the district level, hence The Supreme Court should set an example in this direction, then the lower courts will also follow it. Then those who have been waiting for justice for years will see some ray of hope.
But now again the same question arises that why the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court was forced to say that “Supreme Court does not need to play the role of opposition”, he said that “is it hidden from anyone that For some time now, there has been a trend of challenging every decision of the government and even every law passed by the Parliament in the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court will review every decision of the government and the Parliament with the help of PILs and even If he will put a stop to the implementation of the laws without examining their legality, as happened with the agricultural laws, then he will be seen only in the role of opposition? If the Supreme Court has to strengthen its image as a people’s court, then it will have to stop reviewing every decision of the Parliament and will have to take the initiative to provide speedy and cheap justice to the people of the country at the stipulated time, this is the key to democracy in its own right. Expected from the body.